Monthly Archives: November 2011

Nerd Fashion

The hallmark of nerd fashion is practicality.  Not the sort of practicality that thinks, “I’m going to be on my feet most of the day.  I think I’ll wear my Cole Haan flats instead of my Christian Louboutin heels.”  It’s practicality mixed with overthinking.  As in black is elegant + white goes with everything = Amy dresses like the help at her aunt’s fancy dinner party.  It’s often practicality mixed with overthinking mixed with cheapness with results like this:

Amy in a garish yellow fleece over a bright red windbreaker.

It’s early morning.  I’m going rollerblading.   I need the yellow fleece to be visible, but (I think) it’s really cold out this morning so I need a windbreaker.  But the fleece has to be on top for the whole visibility thing.  Of course, I could spend$159 for a warm, high-visibility jacket at REI (and, as a bonus, I could apparently zip things into my armpits):

much better-looking bright yellow cycling jacked from REI

But I’m a nerd!  Why on earth would I spend $159 when I have the ingredients for a perfectly practical solution?

Things that are inexplicably OK, part 2

The New Yorker recently published an article on premature birth that inspired this thoroughly appalling letter:

So let me get this straight:  Instead of ensuring that our educational system teaches all of our children, we should “accept death,” lest we be excessively sentimental to the detriment of . . . the special education students to whom we so desperately — but  apparently inappropriately? — want to cling.  What does Linda Bonin of Kirkland Washington think we should do instead?   Administer the PSAT prenatally?   What really frosts my shorts is that Ms. Bonin was almost certainly regarded as a good person — someone who liked to help people — possibly even by the parents of the special education students whose very existence she regretted, unsentimentally.

Who the hell is Ms. Bonin to decide that her students didn’t deserve to live.  Who are any of us?

Time

Tim and I have a mixed marriage.

Not really religion :  even though we’re technically of two different faith traditions, we’ve found we often have more in common with each other than either of us has with most of the rest of our respective tribes.

Not sports teams:  I converted.

And of course, we’re both lawyers.  I have *no* idea how mixed marriages between lawyers and non-lawyers work.  What on Earth do they talk about?

No, Tim and I are a mixed marriage with respect to time.  I’m analog.  He’s digital.

For example, I don’t believe that the time of day comes in chunks smaller than five minutes.  So I would no more say “it’s 12:37” than I’d say “it’s 12:37:42.03.”  It’s either 12:35 or 12:40.  And truthfully, I’m much more likely to see this

and say “twelve thirty” or “quarter of one.”  Because really, who needs to know that it’s “twenty-five of one?”   In fact, I’m likely to see this:

digital clock showing 12:37

and say  “twelve thirty” or “quarter of one.”  This, of course, drives Tim up the wall.

When we first met, my watch looked like this:

watch with hands but no numbers

That’s right — no numbers whatsoever.*   Do you really need them?  Look at that watch face.  You know all you need to know about the time:  it’s that time of the afternoon when you should start thinking more seriously about what you are going to eat for dinner.

I’m also generally late.  This is based on (1) my refusal to remember the digits to the right of the colon in the start time of any event and (2) the fact that when that time rolls around, I view it as my signal to start getting ready to go.  Thus, if I were in charge of getting us on a 12:37 flight, I would internalize it as “12 something,” and at 12 something,  start to think about packing for the trip.  This is why I am *never* in charge of getting us to the airport on time.  Occasionally, on a lark, I take charge of some lesser event, say, dinner reservations at a steak joint where they know us, we’re not meeting anyone, and if I totally screw it up, we can eat in the bar.   I can usually get us there within 20 minutes one side or the other of when we’re supposed to be there.

Where it really gets interesting, however, is where Tim is forced reassert control over the time situation.  This is when we discovered his time-bending abilities.  For example, if we’re supposed to be at his parents’ house at noon….  Pause to explain that in the Fox family, the time gene follows the paternal line.  This was clearly not so in our family, where my father had more or less my attitude and aptitude toward time and my mother and brother share Tim’s precision.  But when we’re set to meet the Foxes at, say, noon, we generally get a call at 11:55 asking our ETA.  (Love you, Denver!)

Back to time-bending.  If I’ve managed to make us late — say, just as a hypothetical, by waiting for the actual necessary departure time to begin a long list of pre-departure tasks (change clothes, brush teeth, gather miscellaneous items that belong in my purse, put the dogs out, wait several minutes for Saguaro to select the optimum location to pee, bring the dogs in, locate my coat, etc.) — Tim will reassert control over time.  This is not an adversarial process.  It’s not “Dammmit, we need to get going.”  It’s the fact that once Tim is in the car with me, a trip that — based on the speed limit, the physical capabilities of the van, and the theory of relativity as I understand it — takes 30 minutes will in fact take 10 minutes.  I have no idea how he does it.  We call it “Timmifying time” and it has to be used judiciously, as randomly Timmifying any given trip has the risk of getting you to your destination very early, leaving you as, say, the first two people to arrive at a heinously boring bar dinner.  In those situations, we retroactively Amify the time by stopping at the actual bar and preparing ourselves, chemically AND chronologically, for the event.

*********************

* My watch would still look like this if I could find one for under $25.  I bought this for a couple of bucks in Hong Kong in about 1984 and it long ago gave up the ghost.  Unfortunately, I don’t buy nice watches for the same reason I don’t buy nice pens:  I lose them.  I long ago figured out that this wasn’t going to change, and that rather than freaking out over losing an expensive watch, I would simply buy Timexes or Swatches and replace them as needed.

Defame This!

Remember just the other day I was ridiculing some over-caffeinated opposing counsel for accusing CCDC of defamation for posting, on its website, pleadings in case alleging that his client violated the ADA.  Highlight:

 

My position is that you and your clients have been defaming my clients by raising false allegations of discrimination . . .

 

On Wednesday, we got the judge’s decision on our motion for summary judgment.  Here’s page 3 — the key portion: 

 


That’s right, Ladies and Gentlemen, summary judgment granted to plaintiffs!  Big thanks for the excellent legal work of Team CCDC:  Kevin Williams, Andrew Montoya, and Briana McCarten.

 

My Day: A Chart

Flew home from Portland, wheelchair fail, and two very different court decisions in a short period of time:



 

This Week In Random Media Hypocrisy

Breaking News!  Did you know that the mayor of a  major American city said that treating African-Americans equally was an “inconvenience” that was “unfair to average people” because it made them “uncomfortable”?  You didn’t!?  What a scandal – how did the media miss this?

Oh, right, sorry — it was just the civil rights of people with disabilities.  Silly media consumers — you know that’s not the same thing.  So no reason to expect 24/7 handwringing, apologies, and navel-gazing talk shows about the state of civil rights in response to the MAYOR OF OUR LARGEST CITY SAYING THAT RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF HIS MINORITY-GROUP CONSTITUENTS IS INCONVENIENT AND UNFAIR TO “AVERAGE” PEOPLE.

In fact, I have to cut the intrepid reporters on the civil rights beat some slack on this because they were busy pursuing a much more important story.

Yes, leading liberal website ThinkProgress was far too busy tracking the astonishing news that  beauty queen got drunk and used a bad word.  In fact, the website was so on top of this story that they got an …

That’s right, an EXCLUSIVE.  You won’t read this important story ANYWHERE ELSE!   And in fact, ThinkProgress has the crucial details, too.  Miss Virginia’s roommate told the reporter that she was “extremely intoxicated” that night and seemed upset that she did not have the full house to herself, so she  “downgraded people based on their physical appearance and economic status.”  Now this is indeed breaking civil rights news:  college girl gets drunk, says something stupid and hurtful.

How on earth did ThinkProgress beat out The Onion to this important scoop?