- It’s a policy built on emotion
- about animals
- that solves a tiny part of an enormous problem
- by imposing on a marginalized part of society
- without listening to the lived experience of those folks
- letting big corporations make bold declarations of solidarity
- without holding accountable those and other corporations that cause the real problems.
The disability rights movement needs names for ableist dorks equivalent to “Becky” and “Chad.” Suggestions?
Update: I love the suggestion of “Wally” the White Ableist Liberal. Thanks, MontanaBradley!
As I’ve written before, I was a very enthusiastic about Saira Rao’s campaign for Congress in Colorado’s CD-1. She ran on a progressive, inclusive platform, and received endorsements from a wide and diverse range of people and organizations. Her opponent — the incumbent Diana DeGette — was, IMHO, out of touch and did not really give a rat’s ass about civil rights and, in my specific experience, disability rights.
Rao was working hard — and successfully — to make the Democratic Party the inclusive party it needs to be to move forward.
On Tuesday, Rao lost to DeGette, but got 30% of the vote — having started six months ago with no name recognition. It was an amazing, energetic, inspiring campaign, touching the lives of people who had given up on the Dems as a relevant force in their lives.
It would have been the perfect time for DeGette to reach out to Rao and her voters. That’s what we so desperately need in these frightening, divisive, Trumpian times.
Seriously? I’m not sure DeGette could have found more alienating words if she’d stayed up late and hired Alienating Words Consultants. This is now *not* to build an inclusive party and how — in more purple districts — how to alienate the coalition we need to win in November and in 2020.
But the good news is, Saira Rao and her supporters are not going away. She’s starting to organize for 2020 and will keep working for progress in the meantime. Sign up to join her and keep track of this inspiring new political force.
I’m writing to urge you to vote for Saira Rao in the primary for our CD-1 representative. Ballots are due tomorrow (drop-off and other info here: https://www.coloradodems.org/resources/faqs-answered-for-the-primary/) and I wanted to make this last, important pitch and to urge you to read Neeti Pawar’s article here:
Neeti Pawar is a brilliant and tireless Denver civil rights lawyer. Her experience, described in the article, was consistent with our experiences over the years of our current representative deeply NOT getting disability rights, the area of law I know and care the most about. As has become much clearer in recent days, we are living in increasingly dangerous times — especially for people of color, people with disabilities, LGBTQ people, and other marginalized people. We need a representative who gets this and acts on it, not one who sidesteps civil rights as “not her issue.”
And if health care *is* Rep. DeGette’s issue (as her staffers indicated to Ms. Pawar in the linked article), we — as civil rights and civil liberties fans — have reason for concern. Rep. DeGette signed into law a bill that imposes Electronic Visit Verification, a system that will require Medicaid recipients and their aides to wear electronic monitors to make sure they are getting and receiving services. A more intrusive and infantilizing system I cannot possibly imagine. It is one that has members of the disability rights community very concerned about privacy and autonomy.
Interestingly, in response to outreach by a local pro-DeGette attorney, she responded that she “has always fought to pass legislation in support of disability rights, including stem cell research.” This underscores her cluelessness. Touting work on behalf of stem cell research as a disability rights position is exactly precisely not getting disability rights. It’s saying “I support making people with disabilities not disabled anymore.” Stem cell research is a great cause; it’s just not remotely a disability rights cause, and anyone for whom that is a go-to response doesn’t get it.
Ultimately, my pitch to vote for Saira Rao may seem like an odd ask in this particular year, as she is a Democratic woman running against an incumbent . . . Democratic woman. So she won’t flip a House seat or overthrow the patriarchy (yet). But after having the chance to meet her and speak with her, I believe she is what we need the most: a better Democrat. A Democrat that can help us build a future party, powerful and inclusive, that will leave the Republican cavemen behind. A Democrat who will inspire people of color, people with disabilities
I’m pasting Ms. Pawar’s entire article below. Please read. Please share. Please vote.
We Deserve Better
By Neeti Pawar
I saw the images of Diana DeGette traveling to Texas purportedly to assess the conditions in which immigrants are being detained. Many are thanking her — it makes me livid.
We tried to tell her. Me, personally, and many others. Like my friend and tireless immigrant rights activist and attorney Christina Brown who’s been on the front lines of the abhorrent conditions of family detention recently reminded us: “I’m glad people care. But I’m bitter. We screamed so loud in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017…and no one listened.”
No one listened.
I’ve told my story to some; my friend Saira has told it to many. For her it was the last straw to a series of her own experiences in being taken advantage of and then ignored by the Democratic Party establishment — her breaking point in deciding to run for congress to unseat the 22-year, 11-term incumbent.
I had spent several days at DIA when the first Muslim travel ban issued. I witnessed a handful of immigration attorneys passionately and determinedly ensure no family would be lost in the system or turned back without a fight. None were Muslim, none were South Asian. But they cared so deeply to defend against the injustice.
A few days later I attended what was promoted as a “town hall” meeting with my CD-1 Representative, DeGette. I submitted detailed questions online; when I arrived, I was told those questions were just for data collection, that she wouldn’t be answering them. There were cards to write questions — so I wrote them out again. I was told they would be used to identify “themes” and not answered.
The town hall was held at the Police Protection Association building. A location which was marginalizing in and of itself — consistent with the pattern of being out of touch with many of her constituents; or worse, intentionally reinforcing their oppression (this is how systemic racism and oppression works).
The “town hall” was a prepared power point presentation about the Affordable Health Care Act; no questions were taken. Out of growing frustration of my representative’s failure to address the crisis around immigration that was actually occurring in her district and state (Muslim ban, ICE raids, and ICE trolling courthouses and communities), and as one of very few people of color in the 1000+ audience, I disrupted. I stood up and asked my representative to address the crisis and state her plan to protect the obvious next target — DACA status individuals.
My Representative’s response: That she wasn’t aware of any raids, and outright condescending dismissal that DACA status people were at risk; blind unsupported assurances that no one was coming after DACA. She didn’t want to hear it; she didn’t listen. She literally scoffed at my suggestion, at my “paranoia”; suggested I was part of the problem because I was fueling fear mongering; overreacting. She didn’t listen.
On my way out, one of her staffers asked me to meet with her to talk about my concerns. I scheduled a meeting and met with her and another staffer at the Denver office. I shared my background, my experience and my concern, my connections to marginalized communities. I wanted to help. I wanted to give my Representative information from communities whom she was not hearing from. Her staffers nodded in agreement with the frustration. I was hopeful, until they related to me with resignation: “civil rights just isn’t her issue.” That her focus is on health care. It was clear to me: my representative didn’t see that that health care is civil rights. She was clueless to the interconnectedness of all issues and didn’t want to even try to be inclusive around issues of equity.
Stunned, I left. She didn’t want to listen. She didn’t think this was something she was responsible for. She had a long-standing active community member in her office wanting to help. To organize, to educate, to volunteer her time. To help her use her platform and power to get ahead of the issues we knew were coming. The writing was on the wall. She didn’t care.
She didn’t care. She didn’t listen.
Over 1 ½ years later, she’s now traveling to the US/Mexico border. To “see for herself.” It’s too little too late. It’s insulting to those who have been on the border for years, making personal sacrifice to their personal wellbeing, their financial wellbeing, placing strain on relationships and careers. The detention facilities have been in existence for years — under her watch, under both a Democratic president and the current president. She ignored it. And she ignored pleas from those who “screamed so loud in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017.” And she didn’t listen. A report on ICE’s practice of family detention was issued in 2016 recommending DHS discontinue the general use of family detention. She did nothing. I expect more from my representative than merely signing on to letters. I expect action.
The public outrage over the recent policy to separate children from families finally got her attention. It was all of us, the people, who reacted loud and vigorously to ultimately pressure the administration to reverse the policy of separating children from their families.
She failed those who needed her most. Now, after the crisis is full blow in the *public eye* (because let’s be clear, the dehumanizing practice of family detention has been happening for years), and during an election year, she now decides to say something. To use her most secure seat in the country, her 22 years of “coalition building,” her “experience” in office, to finally do something. And what does she do? She does what she always does… she leaves her post. She has to “see for herself.” She “co-signs” legislation — co-signing means another representative does the work, writes the bill, gathers the support, builds the coalition. And DeGette allows her rubber-stamped signature to be placed among her colleagues. That’s what co-signing means. It takes nothing, no work, no political capital; it’s the opposite of leadership.
Is this the best she can do in 22 years?
She should have listened.
We deserve better.
Updated 6/26/18 to add responsive information.
This cute puppy says: Get out and vote on Tuesday! Vote for Saira Rao! Vote for Cary Kennedy! We can have better Democrats, starting this fall, and continuing the blue wave in 2020. But it starts this Tuesday, June 26, here in Colorado, when we have the privilege of voting for some pretty amazing progressives:
These women are our future.
Remember all those times you held your nose and voted Dem because wtf they’re better than the alternative and, you know, The Court! The Court! I feel like I’ve voted for a lot of centrist mediocrity on those grounds. Bill Clinton. Al Gore. John Fucking Edwards fer pete’s sake. And Hillary Clinton, too. And here in CD1 in Colorado, I would dutifully check the box for Diana DeGette every two years because, well, why not? A reliable D vote and no viable alternative, but also no discernible fucks given about the communities I give a fuck about.
And I spent a lot of time trying to talk my more progressive friends out of doing dumb things like voting for Ralph Nader* or Jill Stein. Those things remain dumb, and I remain right, but I also felt that they had a point; that we had a lot of entrenched, white, privileged, mediocrity** carrying the D flag year in year out. At worst, this silences and alienates voters of color, voters with disabilities, and other marginalized voters; even at best, it bores the crap out of everyone, until our eyes glaze over and we . . . just . . . don’t . . . vote.
No más! Throughout Colorado and the nation we are getting the opportunity to elect better, more progressive, more enthusiastic Dems. Dems unafraid to call bullshit. Dems willing to call out racism, sexism, cronyism, and mediocrity. And then do something about it. Here are just some highlights:
- Saira Rao is calling for the elimination of student debt, unleashing the resources and creative power of a generation and jumpstarting our economy.
- Cary Kennedy will lead Colorado to universal health care coverage.
- Julie Gonzales has spent her career fighting for immigrants and other underrepresented folks and will work her ass off to protect our civil rights.
- Serena Gonzales-Gutierrez will fight to end the pay gap for women and especially women of color.
- Stephany Rose Spaulding will fight gun violence as a public health crisis.
- Hazel Gibson is fighting to ensure all kids have access to highly trained teachers and early childhood development programs.
- Ashley Wheeland stands by workers and will fight for paid family leave, collective bargaining, and employee rights.
But none of this happens — our bright future of a more progressive, more grassroots, more activist Democratic Party doesn’t happen — UNLESS YOU VOTE!
This is our future! Let’s all get out and
VOTE! THIS TUESDAY!
*Love you, Robin. Miss you, Laura.
** Into which category Nader and Stein emphatically and ironically fall.
I’m privileged to join Eve Hill, Scott LaBarre, Jennifer Mathis, and Arlene Mayerson in the letter below. I urge you to donate to Sam’s campaign and especially to forward this to others in the disability rights community and/or friends and family in Michigan.
As some of you may know, Sam Bagenstos is running to be a justice of the Michigan Supreme Court. Sam has been a stalwart of our community for more than two decades. We hope you will join us in supporting his candidacy.
We are all bombarded with political appeals these days and it can be difficult to decide whom to support. This one we’re totally clear about. We want to ask you personally to support Sam with a contribution of $500, $250 or $100.
The future of the Michigan Supreme Court depends on the outcome of this race. Republican Governor Rick Snyder appointed four of the seven current justices to the Court. Two of those Snyder appointees are standing for election for the first time this fall. The outcome of the election will be pivotal for numerous issues of extraordinary importance.
Many of you know Sam personally. But for those of you who don’t, Sam is the Frank G. Millard Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. As an attorney, he has played an instrumental role in some of the most important disability rights cases during the last quarter century, including arguing three ADA cases in the U.S. Supreme Court. In the Obama Administration, Sam led the Justice Department’s disability rights enforcement as the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. His work on enforcing the Olmstead integration mandate, on demanding accessibility in technology, and on promulgating the 2010 ADA regulations made his tenure at DOJ an extremely rich one for the disability rights movement. Earlier in his career, Sam clerked for Judge Stephen Reinhardt on the Ninth Circuit and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the U.S. Supreme Court.
In short, Sam is both a dedicated public servant and a brilliant and ethical lawyer.
Please note: You must be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident to contribute. Contributions are NOT tax-deductible and may only be drawn from American funds. The Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct prohibits a judicial campaign committee from soliciting more than $100 per attorney. If you are an attorney, please regard this as informative and not a solicitation for more than $100. However, an attorney may make, and the judicial campaign committee may accept, a contribution from an attorney in any amount up to the individual maximum of $6,800.
Thank you for taking the time to consider supporting Sam Bagenstos for the Michigan Supreme Court.
Eve L. Hill*
Paid for by SAMUEL BAGENSTOS FOR JUSTICE | 2730 E STADIUM BLVD NO 310 |Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Sitting around a table with a bunch of attorneys. One guy describes a multi-party case involving parties who are blind. He says: “We call them the ‘two blind mice.'”
My brain chokes momentarily. I call him out: “you gotta be kidding me!”
No one else says a thing.
He says, “sorry you were offended. People have different senses of humor.”
Earlier in the meeting, he consistently referred to female judges and magistrates as “The,” for example “The Krieger” or “The Tafoya.” Male judges were just “Hegarty” or “Watanabe.”
Called him on that, too: “Are we only The-ing the women? Or the men, too? I want to know how we should use our determiners.” I was actually sort of cracking myself up with those questions, but appear to have been the only person amused.
Don’t think he really knew what I was talking about. I did get an eyeroll from another woman in the room for that one.
I’m guessing I’ve been added to everyone’s list of humorless women. Whatever. Way too old to give a fuck about that.
Or maybe now I’m The Robertson.