- Use Equal Exchange French roast coffee in a French press to make approximately 1/2 cup too much exquisitely strong coffee in the early morning.
- Don’t drink all of it.
- Sometime in the afternoon, poor remainder over ice.
There is just so much to love about this. That the plaintiffs’ lawyer — our friend Darold Killmer — included John Prine’s beautiful lyrics in his complaint.
Then the coal company came with the world’s largest shovel
And they tortured the timber and stripped all the land
Well, they dug for their coal till the land was forsaken
Then they wrote it all down as the progress of man …
And daddy won’t you take me back to Muhlenberg County
Down by the Green River where Paradise lay?
Well, I’m sorry my son, but you’re too late in asking
Mister Peabody’s coal train has hauled it away.
That this annoyed Peabody Energy, the defendant. That they were so annoyed and clueless that they moved to strike the lyrics as “irrelevant, immaterial, impertinent and/or inflammatory.” (I love “impertinent” with its overtones of the Dowager Countess of Downton Abbey.) That this motion gave Darold the opportunity to write things like this:
Defendant Peabody Energy Corp. has paid its lawyers thousands of dollars to submit a 17 page brief in support of its four page Motion to Strike song lyrics from the Complaint because . . . it wants “to avoid the expenditure of time and money that must arise from litigating spurious issues . . .”
A song can’t hurt Peabody, and recitation of a portion of the song will not cause Peabody undue difficulty or expense, except that which is self-inflicted.
Undersigned counsel is happy to report that the frequency of references to Bruce Springsteen’s lyrics in all types of legal writing is rising.
In fact, there is an entire section of the brief entitled “Non-Traditional Legal Writing is Good,” and I commend that to my vast audience of word nerds (hi, Mom!).
Obviously, the most delicious thing of all is that if Peabody had just put on its big-kid undies, ignored the lyrics, and moved on, no one would know. Well, all of us with the privilege of hearing Darold recite his legal exploits would know, but it might not have surfaced outside the bar/bars of Denver.
No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed.
It is so ordered.
Obergefell v. Hodges, No. 14-556, 2015 WL 2473451, at *23 (U.S. June 26, 2015).
Far more Americans are killed each year by the shooters in our midst like Craig Stephen Hicks than have ever been killed by all the jihadist terrorist outfits that have ever stalked this earth. That’s the price, or so the rhetoric goes, of our wild freedom. But maybe to understand the Chapel Hill murders better we need to imagine how it would be playing out if it were the other way around—if some gun-toting Muslim, with a habit of posting hate messages about secular humanists, took it upon himself to execute a defenseless family of them in their home.
The effort was “motivated by our service to Christ and his call to love our neighbors,” Gonnerman told The Post.
“We initially started thinking if a whole lot of us, in our clergy collar and worship attire, sent our photos to them, it would make a really powerful statement,” Rev. Kris Totzke, a pastor in Texas, told The Post. “Then, it really snowballed, and we got people all over the country and of all different faiths.”
We went to the ACLU of Colorado’s annual dinner on Friday. This is always a very energizing experience — to be surrounded by friends and allies who are working hard (and/or donating boatloads of money) to protect civil rights and civil liberties. It was especially inspiring this year for a number of reasons. Our friend Laura Rovner was honored with an award for her amazing work on behalf of inmates in solitary confinement and other extreme conditions. We all cheered our behinds off for a trio of recent court victories in police abuse cases. And I enjoyed hanging with the next generation of civil rights advocates.
Laura’s friend and colleague Jeanne Theoharis introduced her, and spoke about the long struggle for civil rights and civil liberties. Laura “walks in the shoes of Rosa Parks,” not because she is herself a Black woman standing up (sitting down) to racism, but because Rosa Parks was more than just a single moment in 1955. She was an experienced civil rights worker, who had been advocating throughout the 1930s and 1940s as well, laboring for decades without much success. Jeanne made me imagine a far more just future, in which Laura’s work will be remembered for the ground-breaking qualities it truly has.
As an aside, I got into an interesting discussion after about the pros and cons of comparing a white lawyer to an African-American activist. My thoughts, which probably need their own post at some point, are summed up much more eloquently by this graphic by Dan Wilkins:
As the graphic says at the bottom, “There is power in knowing my struggle is your struggle and yours mine.” If we are too quick to cordon off one set of struggles as the unique property of their protagonists, we miss the opportunity to perceive and fight the common enemies of fear, ignorance, and hatred of the unknown.
OK, where was I? Oh right – the trio of amazing police abuse cases. Our friends at Rathod Mohamedbhai achieved a $3.25 million settlement on behalf of Jamal Hunter against the Denver Sheriff Department, and our friends at Killmer, Lane & Newman, won back to back verdicts, first (with co-counsel Kate Stimson) $1.8 million against the Denver Police for a warrantless raid on the wrong house, resulting in wrongful prosecution, then $4.65 million against the Sheriff Department for the jail abuse death of homeless pastor Marvin Booker. The first article stated that Denver had paid $16.7 million in damages since 2004 before these three cases; if my math is correct, the total now stands at $26.4. And that’s just in damages — it doesn’t count the vast City resources (my tax dollars!) that go toward defending the indefensible. It’s frustrating, after all those years and dollars, that the Denver Department of Safety can’t prevent these abuses. It was satisfying to be able to congratulate breaking-news civil rights heroes Rathod Mohamedbhai and Killmer, Lane & Newman on Friday.
Now for the fun part (with apologies for incompetent phone photography). I was so glad Laura brought her amazing daughter Claire
and that we got to sit with Brittany Glidden and The Littlest Civil Rights Advocate, Ellie:
And after the main event, dancing happened:
Repentance is a powerful theme throughout the Bible. But its meaning is often not well understood. Repentance is not about being sorry or just feeling guilty. It is about turning in a new direction. The biblical word for repentance in the original Greek is metanoia, which means you are going in the wrong direction, and it’s time to turn right around.
Jim Wallis never fails to make me think. It’s easy to express regret; much harder to change direction.