[I’m very excited to present a guest post by Frances Lively. She is responding to Joanne Ostrow’s August 9, 2012 column in the Denver Post.]
Dear Ms. Ostrow:
I have been a subscriber to The Denver Post for a very long time and always enjoy reading your column. You are a good writer with an enjoyable style and an intelligent approach to television matters.
I wondered, however, about one segment of your “Good News, Bad News,” column in the August 9, 2013, issue, concerning diversity. You are correct in noting that there are far too many white males and too few Hispanics featured in TV shows. But how can you say it represents a positive step forward for diversity to have Blair Underwood — an able-bodied person, albeit a member of a minority group — portraying a person with a disability? This casting makes the same mistake that “Glee” made in one of its teenaged characters and does not really advance inclusion of people with disabilities in our society.
I understand that the networks worry about ratings and would prefer to take their chances on a bankable star in the main role in a new show, but I would hope that you could at least point out this irony in your column rather than lauding the networks for this short-sighted casting. The irony of your comments only increases with your follow-up regarding Michael J. Fox, who does, indeed, have the illness that is to be portrayed in his new show, but who is himself a very well-known, long-time white male star. Perhaps your “good news” instead should have been that there are good actors available who happen to have disabilities and who would love the chance to be featured in a network television show.
Please do not file my message under the heading of “Can’t please all the people all of the time.” Instead, give me credit for not lighting into you regarding your description of Underwood’s character as “a highly capable, sexually active paraplegic.” Time does not permit a discussion of all of the problems with that statement.
I hope you will put my letter in the file for “How can we keep networks from being ignorant.” I’m sure many of your readers would appreciate your using your position in our community as a critic to nudge the networks in a better direction. Thanks very much for your time.
Ms. Ostrow responded:
Thanks for writing.
Agreed, it would be better to have a disabled actor playing a disabled character. but at least the character exists.
I’ll return to this topic in the future and keep your comments in mind.
Meanwhile I hope if you watch “Ironside” you’ll see what I mean about his action-hero antics…