Though what this judge thought it meant is beyond me. The awesome Barry Roseman posts a quote of the day for a bunch of us civil rights lawyer types. Here was today’s:
The commission says that the company fired [Donnica Venters] because she wanted to pump breast-milk. Discrimination because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical discrimination is unlawful. Related conditions can include cramping, dizziness, and nausea while pregnant.
Even if the company’s claim that she was fired for abandonment is meant to hide the real reason — she was wanted to pump breast-milk — lactation is not pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. She gave birth on December 11, 2009. After that day, she was no longer pregnant and her pregnancy-related conditions ended.
Firing someone because of lactation or breast-pumping is not sex discrimination.*
Hold on. You may have missed the last line, so I’ll re-WordPress-special-quote-function it:
Firing someone because of lactation or breast-pumping is not sex discrimination.
Makes total sense: none of the men were permitted to lactate or pump breast milk at work either. QED!
* EEOC v. Housing Funding II, Ltd., 11-cv-02442 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 2012), slip op. at 2.