Because I only have to dress up from the waist up and can wear

badass socks out of camera range.

If you’re not watching The Killing, you should be.  It’s an incredible series, right up there behind The Wire as far as I’m concerned for Best TV Show Ever.  But it endeared itself to this Law Nerd when the last episode discussed one of my favorite, slightly obscure, legal topics:  organizational standing — citing, by name, to the leading case, Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission.

I realize this will be meaningful to only a small fraction of my readership (which might at this point be measure in fractions of actual human bodies).  But it made my night!

No one was going to tell me how to mourn Paul Wellstone’s death, and no one is going to tell me how to celebrate Osama bin Laden’s death.

After Paul Wellstone died in a plane crash in 2002, his funeral became a catharsis for those who loved his brand of popular liberalism and had chafed at the pearl-clutching right-wing-defined patriotic correctness that had settled in after the initial bout of unity following the 9/11 attacks.  These were Wellstone’s friends and his political allies, experiencing the unexpected trauma of his death in a plane crash, during the period when that news was still raw.  It would have been an excellent opportunity for conservatives to shut the fuck up, as a polite individual might when talking to family members of some recently deceased jerk.  You would not tell the jerk’s spouse or parents that however they had chosen to express their grief at the funeral was inappropriate.  You would don your poker face and say, “I’m sorry for your loss.”  Yet the former was the uniform conservative — and then, in those days, inevitable mainstream media — response:  Liberals didn’t mourn correctly.

I think what’s saddest, to be honest, is the defensive tone of the Media Matters link, “debunking” the “myth” that Wellstone’s funeral was a political rally.  I say:  fuck yeah!  He was an unabashedly liberal politician; an upbeat, funny, articulate guy.  He would have loved for his funeral to be a political rally.  The only problem was in the heads and hearts of the critics for not understanding this, and in their brain/mouth filter for not stopping the absurd criticism of the mourners before it left their mouths or keyboards.

This criticism was heard again in response to the memorial service for the folks who died recently in Tucson and in the aftermath of Ted Kennedy’s death.  As someone who has lost a close family member I can say this:  anyone telling me how to mourn will be kicked somewhere painful.

Anyway, I had thought it was the province of conservatives to tell us how we should feel — to dictate emotional correctness — following traumatic national events.  But in the past few days, I’ve seen scolding from the left about celebrating the death of Osama Bin Laden.  Gimme a break!  This is a guy who killed 3000 civilians in one day within our borders, and is responsible for all sorts of other death and mayhem around the world.  We get a day or two of emotional catharsis.  I think this scolding reached the point of caricature in an article — I can’t find the link now — in which we were chided for celebrating bin Laden’s death when there were thousands of American children going hungry each night.  So we’re not allowed to celebrate solving one gigantic, hard-to-solve problem until we’ve solved them all?

Per the bumpersticker:  “Fuck Yeah” is not a Foreign Policy.  So if our entire response to bin Laden’s demise is celebratory swearing, it will be a mistake.  But fer pete’s sake — we get a night or two of jubilation that a bunch of kick-ass American soldiers took out a global menace.

So today I decided to stretch before running.  It took me a while to get around to it.  By which I mean that it was probably first recommended in about 1976 by my friend Monica when we would run together by the canal in Georgetown.  I’ve thought about it approximately every time I’ve run since then, but not actually gotten around to it until today.  I finally did the math:  scoliosis + couch potato habits + age = predictably bad results.  So: stretching.

Didn’t that last paragraph make it sound like I’ve been a runner since 1976?  Fooled you!  I have run during three phases in my life, which can conveniently be referred to by my running partners:  Monica; Jenny; and Saguaro (with a brief interlude of Laura).

I ran with Monica for a brief period in high school.  She had the decency to slow down and shorten considerably her long, crew-rowing-inspired runs on the towpath by the C&O canal to let me huff and puff alongside her.  This lasted, oh, about five scenic canal runs before the resurgence of my couch potato tendencies coincided with the end of Monica’s almost infinite patience, which end had been cleverly disguised by her almost infinite good manners.

I didn’t run again until college, when I ran with my roommate Jenny.  We were only actually roommates for second semester freshman year, when she very graciously did not object when I moved into the postage-stamp-sized “emergency double” that the housing folks had reassured her she would have as a single for the rest of the year.   But she will forever be “my roommate Jenny.”  We had roughly the same approach to running:  same speed; same frequency; and I believe the same number of runs before we got bored and stopped.  Or at least I did – Jenny probably runs marathons now.  Sigh.

I didn’t run again until we got our second dog, Saguaro, in 2007.  If you know me and are good at math, you’ll already have figured out that this is a roughly 25-year gap in my running career.  I didn’t even start running when we got our first dog in 2002.  Chinook is a very mellow dog, and was a very mellow puppy.  If we wanted to do things, he’d come along; if we wanted to veg, he vegged.  He fit right in.

Even though they are the same breed and technically cousins, Saguaro was a different dog right from the start.  For example, both dogs are golden retrievers, so we expected a certain amount of, well, retrieving.  Chinook fetched* but did not retrieve.  Ever.  He would run after tennis balls, sticks, Frisbees, etc, but would pick up the object and head off in a different direction, lie down, and chew on it.  Or just drop it out of boredom and find something else to do.  When fetching in lakes — which he does purely because he loves to swim — he generally brings the ball back to a point just far enough from shore that a wading human** cannot get to it without getting the bottom of her shorts wet.  The ponds of Chatfield are littered with Chinook’s tennis balls.  Saguaro has retrieved, accurately and persistently, since the day we brought him home at 7 weeks.  No training necessary.  The dog was simply born with a retriever gene that Chinook doesn’t have.

The difference in the dogs was also evident in their energy levels.  Chinook’s favorite exercise is rolling in the grass or snow

eating mulch, and sleeping.  Saguaro, if he doesn’t exercise fairly constantly, is (how can I put this gently about a dog I love with all my heart) a monumental pain in the ass.  He whines.  He paces.  He finds the Frisbee and shoves it in your face as you lie on the sofa taking your first break from the computer in six days.

When we spent a month vacationing in Tucson when Saguaro was four months old, it became clear that we needed a different approach to exercise than we had taken with Chinook (none).  Here, for example, is Saguaro in Tucson not getting the point of the afternoon’s activities:

So then began the third phase of my often-interrupted running career.  For those of you who want to know how to get back into running when you’re a 46-year-old couch potato, here’s how:  run with two dogs, at least one of whom will need to pee or poop every 50 yards or so, for approximately ¼ mile, turn around, and run home.  You will get slightly more exercise than this suggests mathematically because at two points in the run, you will need to find — and run to and from — a dumpster.  But I have run — with some brief interruptions — since then, working gradually up to my current distance:  one mile or two dog poops, whichever comes first.

The brief Laura interlude to the Saguaro phase:  My friend Laura does amazing things like teaching the next generation of lawyers how to be good litigators without being assholes . . . . AND running marathons.  Although she is generally brilliant, when I said I had taken up running, she made a category error and assumed that when I used the word “run” it meant the same thing as when she used the word “run.”  And so she invited me to “run” with her.  Once.  After the obligatory stops to wait for and clean up from doggie bathroom breaks, and after seriously considering calling an ambulance for me at about the 2 mile mark, she caught on, and has graciously limited herself to inviting me to run in charity races of 5K or less, which I still don’t finish, but which give us an extra chance to gossip in the car on the way over.

But I started to write about stretching because I finally stretched.  Today.  For the first time.  I discovered two things.   The first is that between being a body-unaware klutz and not being able to tell left from right,* it took me a freakishly long time to figure out what this diagram was telling me to do:

And I discovered that, like running, stretching is a group activity in our house.  The view from my stretches:

***************************************

* Past tense.  Since being joined by Saguaro, he doesn’t even fetch any more, but lets Saguaro handle the whole annoying process.

** A wading 5’2” human.

*** I read somewhere that this is called “directional dyslexia” which sounds way cooler than “can’t tell left from right.”  But whatever it is, I have it, and it provides hours of amusement to Tim, who has learned to say things like “turn toward me” (for a right turn when I’m driving) or “do you mean left left or right left?”

While replying to an email in gmail today, one of the ads along the side of the post touted:  “Accurate VooDoo Spells.”  Of course I had to check out the website.   Turns out she will help with “whatever problems [I’ve]* been having” and provides a “100% guarantee.”

Any thoughts on where that falls in the Rules of Professional Conduct?

*********************

*Yes, I’m such a grammar & punctuation nerd that I had to square-bracket the VooDoo lady’s ad quote.

I have a bike in San Francisco.  After one especially stressful hearing, we were returning to the hotel room and passed another guest wheeling a cool-looking bicycle down the hall.

Me: Cool bike!

Woman with cool bike: Wanna buy it?

Me: Yes.

And so I came to own a bike in San Francisco.  I quickly learned several important things about my new bike.  The previous owner was a much taller woman than I am.  And the bike has 21 gears.  I have figured out the height adjustments — though I’m convinced I look something like this:

As for the gears, I pedal along happily in what appears to be gear 14, and am still waiting for someone to tell me what to do with the other 20.

The bike purchase was quickly followed by the bike helmet purchase, the bike lock purchase, and of course the bike rack purchase — as I had not, in my rash original purchase — thought about where the bike would fit in the van when we drive to and from SFO, along with the boxes of office supplies that live in the van, the suitcases we schlep each time, and our 6-foot-tall assistant, Dustin.   To this equipment were added a pair of old running shoes from home and a set of rubber bands from the office supply box, so that when I pedal around Emeryville, I look really truly Extra Dorky:

And this being one town over from Berkeley, all of us comrades get

whereas in capitalist Denver, we have to shell out 25 cents.   Ultimately, though, this whole post was just one big excuse to share these photos, taken about half a mile from our regular hotel in Emeryville, while Tim did the real work of preparing for the hearing that brought us here.

Additional dorkiness obvious in the shadow.

Tim and I have often wondered whether our fathers were separated at birth.  Welllll, since that would make us cousins, we don’t wonder TOO much.  But they are/were both incredibly smart and compassionate, amazing teachers, inveterate tinkerers, and giant nerds with interesting fashion choices.  It’s possible I just described your dad, too, right?  Anyway, when my father-in-law, Denver Fox, recently had back surgery, my mother-in-law prepared this and handed it out to the hospital staff.  The thought was:  he’s more than just another random guy in gurney, he’s:

SPIDERMAN AKA DENVER C. FOX.

The hospital staff loved it, and it’s now posted on Nora’s blog.  Check it out!  Happy Birthday, Denver!

on what would have been his 75th birthday.  My Dad, Peter Robertson, passed in 1997.  I miss him every day, but am very blessed by his wonderful memory. . . and some hilarious photos. One of my father’s favorite expressions was, “life’s too short to take seriously.”   He truly lived by those words . . . .   the not-taking-seriously part and, unfortunately, the too-short part, too.  Herewith a random sample of fun and funny photos.

Dad and his father in front of the Wyoming cabin my Dad was born in.  I think my grandfather was trying to start a dude ranch at the time, so it’s not like they were pioneers.

Summer camp in 1951.

Law school graduation.

Dad, Mom and, um, me.

Rocking the shorts and black socks at Bruce’s 4th (?) birthday.

Going for the hippie look in the 70s.  (I think that lasted through one summer vacation; he was back to his nerd ‘do by the time he went back to the office.)

BYOM!  Dad at my college graduation dinner; also in the photo:  my mother’s parents, his father and Jennifer Glancy’s gorgeous red hair!

Traveling with me in China in around 1983.  Yes, I had a ‘fro. Yes, Dad traveled in rural China in his suit.

And boy did he know how to pack!   I can’t even imagine how he’d deal with the TSA.

Dad and Granddaddy at Dad’s house.  Note the washer/drying/filing system.

At Tim & my wedding – both of us all dressed up!

At our wedding – a goofy moment.

Meeting the President in 1996.

Dad and his grandson (my nephew) Christian at Christian’s second birthday party.

Dad and the orange plastic poodle. To be continued…

WordPress provides lots of helpful statistics for bloggers to obsess over track, one of which is the search terms that have brought people to your blog.   These are some of the searches that have brought people to Thought Snax.  I can only imagine their surprise when they went searching for, say, bride shoes and got a mildly obscene truncated rewrite of the Federal Rules.

ta-nehisi coates compassion
shoe shop
dog snow
westlaw
sandal fashion taipei
candid heeled sandals
research programing
socialism what it is and what it is not
dressup woman
rolling in snow
sandals high heels candid
heel less shoes
“addlepate” etymology
bride shoes
why was west law started
miss south africa 1984
we are here especially to seek your forg*
hang white socks
miss south africa 2010
“red hook road” spoiler
campbells halal
noun insult example neanderthal
benefits of having a dog
snow
ayelet waldman and people with disabilit

* I think WordPress cuts off at a certain number of characters, and that this referred to the phrase “we are here especially to seek your forgiveness,” in a quote from Iman Rauf.  I had a moment of hilarity, though, when I read it as “we are here especially to seek your frog.”